🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion say that indecision on how best to tackle the problem is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue sets out a range of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer sites. Officials say it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. People will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing in search of valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Along the shoreline lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while working overseas. His parent expressed she could not sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to consider this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to handle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families want additional coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to proceed for now. Others argue the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with communities.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need good community discussions to find the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in life after death, providing a theological viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.