🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it appears it’s time for a re-evaluation. Over the years, an celebration that began as a festivity and recollection of heritage, traditions and links between global Black communities, has adopted a commercial tone, expanding to include functions where individuals of African heritage are remunerated to talk to white audiences about “unconscious bias” and “allyship”. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests generated a rise in the industry of displaying cultural sensitivity. However, that period has concluded. The surge has reached its height, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what raising awareness is for.

The History of Black History Celebration

Originally observed in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was created in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of remembrance and recognition in the February's second week. Black History Month developed from this movement and was officially launched in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the US and Canada in February, but also in autumn in the UK, Germany, Éire and the Netherlands.

The observance has transformed since those days, focusing less on the histories of transatlantic enslavement and civil rights battles, and greater focus on notable African descendants in government, the arts, and social movements, and widely honoring the contribution Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in schools where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the way the celebration is commemorated is a indication of the current political situation. How it evolves is a valuable example in how co-option leads to dismantling: the restructuring of Black History Month has impeded the point of it, which is to confront systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Few things illustrate how important it is to reconsider Black History Month more than the current time in which it falls this year. In the UK, a revitalized conservative movement in the shape of the Reform political group is ahead in surveys. In the recent season we saw the biggest extreme right demonstration in the history of Britain. Kemi Badenoch, the person of color at the helm of the right-wing political group, is a firm opponent of the racial justice movement, and we are in a place where a elected representative feels empowered to state that “not seeing any white faces” in specific city neighborhoods is a source of worry. Simultaneously, ultra-nationalist movements are expanding in Europe as a complete entity.

In the US, a massive attack against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been taken, frequently with success, to the supreme judicial bodies of the country. A campaign to scrub Black history and narrative from the historical documents is under way. One of Donald Trump's early administrative commands targeted the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the prestigious establishment, alleging that they of a organized and extensive campaign to rewrite our Nation’s history” by portraying America “as inherently racist”.

Given these circumstances, the celebration represents how minimally it can be effective if it is restricted to either obligatory business commemorations, or stripped of political content festivities of historical achievements, rather than challenging the situation of the current era. It also reveals how its limited duration means that it is separated from the wider consistent effort that is necessary. An academic expert, a prof at a learning establishment, expressed it perfectly when she expressed apprehension about the fleeting superficial actions of the celebration. “The issue with adopting a symbolic stance”, she wrote, “is that it often means that Black History Month evolves into a transient display rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Figuring out how to adjust, modify and expand efforts for fair treatment and appreciation in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a difficult task. There is a temptation to just do away with observances such as Black History Month completely, thinking they are simply not fit for purpose, or are remnants of an time that has been ineffective.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and heritage of racial movements – community-based BLM initiatives, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and certainly, even commercial engagements – form an framework that a considerable labor has been invested in. It is there not just to decay as the politics moves on (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month look like? Firstly, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is distributed across all seasons (as certain organizations are already commencing), parts of its content (particularly around historic Black characters) included in educational programs. It would also be a time that does not avoid politics, and provides room for citizens, particularly the younger generation, to share their anxieties and narratives. What value has basic knowledge of the bygone era when it fails to address the contemporary truth of far-right rallies in the public spaces? Establishments who observe it should not be reassured with the non-confrontational words of “unconscious bias” and awareness of subtle slights, but faced with the risks that face all if fight against prejudice is not approached earnestly. To summarize, Black History Month should be made current, critical, and responsive. It could be that an total re-identification is necessary – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.