🔗 Share this article

I possess some opinions about that remarks delivered by the sports network commentator a well-known announcer following the Serbian champion's victory over the American player in the New York major quarter-finals. Consider – the athlete represents the United States, Fowler is from the US – and sports often encourage patriotic sentiment. A little bit of disappointment would have been appropriate. Rather, Fowler invoked the ongoing absence of US male players at grand slam tournaments: not one of them had lifted a trophy since the last American champion in 2003, and he had been the last one standing in the tournament.

We all love a narrative, me too. But come on. Suppose Fritz had beaten Djokovic for the first time, force of nature the Spanish star was waiting in the following match, who he has never defeated in an competitive encounter. And if he’d someway gotten past that, it would have been defending champion Jannik Sinner, versus him Fritz had lost 10 of the previous eleven sets. Alcaraz and Sinner had also split the last seven major titles (plus the Spaniard proceeded to thrash a tired Serbian in the subsequent match). He stated in press after the loss that he in fact liked his path, because it offered the chance to beat the three best players in the sport in succession. Fritz is well justified to aspire to the achievement; an athlete is supposed to believe in themselves. But entering that Serbian quarter-final what other person sensibly had the drought of US winners on the brain?

The American star's second serve the sole barrier standing in her way and sustained success

The American, 28, is placed fourth in the global rankings starting the upcoming year-end championships and has won his last six encounters over third-ranked Alexander Zverev with increasing ease. It's likely he could take that spot for himself in the future. But evidently that right now, that is as high as he can rise: Sinner and Alcaraz sit a vast gap of performance metrics away. Fritz’s top-class serve and concussive strength on each forehand and backhand are sufficiently enough to dispose of the majority of opponents on the professional circuit. Against the handful of generational talents, though, Fritz is frequently helpless. The past few seasons has seen the curious rise of tall, gangly players who can nevertheless cover the court with the alarming quickness and grace of much shorter players. He is 6ft 5ins and looks it. His movement is stiff, as if he hasn't fully adapted to his legs. So he seldom win a rally that the other player was dictating, and playing a drop shot against him is typically a reliable tactic. That serves as a quite severe limitation on his upside.

Fritz has made a number of significant, unexpected improvements throughout his career. At the beginning of the ten-year period, he was hovering around the lower end of the world's best thirty. 24 months after, he was sniffing the elite ten. Last year, he unexpectedly exploded up to No 4 – and maintained the position. But the subsequent step, mixing it up with and beating all-time-greats like the young Spaniard, Sinner, and even a aging Serbian, is the highest of all. What could Fowler have been thinking? That the American, in 2025, was a legitimate contender to beat them all back-to-back? That it was appropriate commenting on the ongoing slump of US male players winning grand slams when he had departed the US Open in the quarter-finals? The thirst is just too much and the respect for the magnitude of the task insufficient.

The American star made a career-best run to the Wimbledon semi-finals in July.

The American's play in that exact last eight match ought to have been sufficient of an indication. Djokovic triumphed in four sets, a win that only seemed tenuous for moments towards the very end, when Fritz had saved a few match points and had a opportunity to hold for 5-5. The duo looked well-balanced during the rallies, with Fritz creating plenty of opportunities to win the opponent's serve. But the champion rescued break point after service break opportunity, extending the streak to the point of agony. When he finally did claim one of the chances at 5-5 in the second set, he immediately played a terrible service game to lose his own serve again; the Serbian had lulled him into a skirmish secondary to the real battle and compelled him to use far too much energy to win it. Down match points in the final game, his primary delivery sailed to the sky. He prolonged the contest two times on his second serve, but ultimately committed two errors. It was not a collapse, I didn’t think, just a result of needing to hit an excessive number of second serves.

The contest was quite compelling proof that the American is not good enough to defeat any version of Djokovic, that was defeated by the Spaniard in the following match and never especially appeared like he thought he could win. This is absolutely acceptable – the Serbian is the greatest of all time, and might not be at the peak of his physical powers anymore, but has developed enough knowledge and strategic intelligence to make up for a significant portion of the drop-off. The problem is those who were anticipating Fritz to prevail, and pressuring him to achieve that, when he was yet to accomplished anything that suggested he would.

Fritz is an valuable contributor to the tour nonetheless. He’s a calm, thoughtful presence in press conferences, more so than almost anyone on the men's tour except for the Russian star, willing to not only express how he feels or the strategy he felt determined a match, but clarify it. That he ought to bear the brunt of the responsibility for the United States failing to spawn a male major champion since Andy Roddick feels unjust. (Now that Ben Shelton is rubbing shoulders with him in the standings, perhaps they can share that load.)

ATP Finals: Player Divisions

Jimmy Connors Division

• Carlos Alcaraz (Sp)
• The American contender
• Alex de Minaur (Aus)
• The Italian stylist

Swedish icon Division

• Jannik Sinner (It)
• Alexander Zverev (Ger)
• The rising American
• Félix Auger-Aliassime (Can)

“I would likely dwell on it indefinitely if I fail to accomplish it,” the American told an interviewer in the summer of claiming a major. I hope he understands that he’s not a failure if he does not fulfill that objective, that overcoming Alcaraz and Sinner’s dominant, formidable reign is in fact extremely unlikely for all other players. {